In a recent Education Week investigation, federal authorities found that a Missouri district’s use of seclusion and physical restraints was not only excessive but also unlawful—violating federal disability rights protections by using these practices as routine responses rather than last-resort safety measures. So why would someone think it would be okay to restrain a child?
Over a two-year period, more than 300 students were secluded nearly 4,000 times, and about 150 students were restrained 777 times, often for behaviors that did not pose imminent harm. The U.S. Department of Justice described this pattern as “shocking overuse,” stressing that restraint and seclusion carry risks to students’ physical and mental well-being and are not effective tools for long-term behavior change.
What really stands out in the reporting is how frequently these interventions were used for routine classroom noncompliance—not crises. In some cases, students were secluded for actions as minor as knocking over a teacher’s coffee or refusing a class, which raises serious questions about policy, training, and trauma-informed practice in special education settings.
This story isn’t just about one district. It reflects broader, ongoing concerns about how seclusion and restraint are misapplied across the country—and why many experts and advocates argue we need clear limits, strong oversight, and better alternatives that prioritize safety, dignity, and learning for all students. How do you manage noncompliance?
0 Comments